INSI issues coronavirus advisory

INSI issues coronavirus advisory

INSI issues coronavirus advisory

The coronavirus is spreading around the world and is now present in 77 countries and on all continents except Antarctica. As the situation is constantly evolving please ensure you keep up to date with the health authorities’ advice in your own country.

INSI members are cancelling/carefully considering unnecessary travel to protect staff, preparing home working strategies and drawing up contingency plans if major events like the Olympics should go ahead, all while dealing with staff fears and a news agenda almost entirely driven by the fight against the virus. 

Background

Months into the outbreak, health authorities still have limited knowledge of how the virus works and exactly how it is spread. Covid-19 has an estimated average fatality rate of around 1%. In practice that percentage is believed to be lower in young and healthy individuals, but higher in people over 60 and people with underlying conditions, according to the UK Chief Medical Officer.

To put the figure in context, SARS, another coronavirus, had a much higher mortality rate of around 10% but its symptoms were very easily identified and its spread was very limited. Around 8,096 people were affected during the 2002-2003 SARS outbreak and 774 died.

By contrast Covid-19 spreads much more easily from person to person and symptoms can often be mild, making it difficult to identify potential spreaders.

There are also significant differences between Covid-19 and the seasonal flu.

With an estimated average mortality rate of 0.1%, seasonal flu is 10 times less lethal than Covid-19. Most importantly, a vast majority of the population is already immune, or at least partially immune, to seasonal strains of the flu. Vaccine and anti-viral drugs are available for the regular flu.

As Covid-19 is an entirely new virus, there is no immunity at all in the population, no vaccine and no drugs as yet, meaning that an unprecedented number of people may require hospitalisation, putting a great strain on the health system of any country.

Symptoms

The symptoms are fever, a dry cough and shortness of breath. Most people start showing symptoms three to five days after infection, but the maximum incubation period isn’t fully confirmed.

Fever is not always present at the onset and, reportedly, 40% of people who were admitted to hospital in China with Covid-19 did not have a raised temperature. Temperature screening is therefore not a useful tool to detect whether someone is infected, who might be sick, or who might still be capable of spreading the virus.

People in the same risk groups as flu are still thought to be the most affected. That includes people with existing medical conditions, including respiratory problems, but also those with diabetes, heart disease, kidney disease, the immuno-suppressed and, possibly, even pregnant women.

However, not all those who have died were older or had pre-existing conditions.

There have been no known cases of severe infection in anyone who is healthy and under the age of 20.

Transmission

Coronavirus is a respiratory virus and is present in secretions from the nose, throat, mouth and lungs. These secretions are exhaled, coughed, or sneezed out then inhaled. They can also contaminate any kind of mucosal surface such as the eyes, nose and mouth. Some of the larger droplets fall and contaminate surfaces. Tinier droplets can be inhaled and very tiny droplets will actually dry out and become like dust particles. They can remain suspended in the air for a period of time and be inhaled deep into the lungs. These dried out droplets can remain active for hours, or even days, though exactly how long is unknown.

With SARS, another coronavirus, victims only passed on the illness after showing symptoms, which meant that by isolating them the outbreak was brought under control. Diseases like measles, however, are harder to control because the virus can be spread without people knowing that they’re sick. This coronavirus may fall into this category, although this is not confirmed.

The easiest way to control the spread of the virus is by thoroughly and repeatedly washing your hands with soap for at least 20 seconds. If you are in an environment that is contaminated with virus particles, your hands must be clean before coming into contact with your face, nose or mouth. This is a key hygiene precaution that will limit the spread of the virus. Avoid shaking hands.

Scientists estimate that each person who is infected can spread the infection to an average of 2.5 new people.

Tests/treatment

At the time of writing, only government-authorised facilities are able to test for Covid-19. No effective anti-viral drugs have yet been identified but trials are underway.

Masks and goggles

Except in specific circumstances, face masks are not recommended for the general public, as they have not been shown to be protective in any measurable way in studies on the spread of flu viruses. Wearing a mask in wide open spaces, or generally outdoors, is also not useful. 

There are however cases when masks can or should be worn. There are two main kinds of masks:

* Surgical masks: these are the masks most often being worn by members of the public, particularly in Asia where they were common even before the outbreak. They don’t offer protection to the wearer but are instead designed to protect others from sneezes, coughs or simple exhalation. Surgeons use them to avoid contaminating their patients. A surgical mask could be given to someone who is known to be infected or has a cough, cold or the flu in order to protect those around them. Look for a CE mark to show that it meets certain standards of fluid resistance. Fashion masks being sold over the counter with designs on them are unlikely to offer adequate protection.

* High filtration masks: the so-called N95 (in the US) or FFP masks (in the UK and Europe) are used in a medical environment for personal protection. N95 masks are designed to protect against 95% of particles of a 0.3 micron size (the average particle in cigarette smoke, for example, is 0.3 microns in diameter). The equivalent European standard is FFP2 and FFP3 which filters out 94% and 99% respectively. Masks must fit tightly. If air is getting in around the edges the mask will not work. Beards, for example, interfere with the contact between the mask and the edges of the skin. A high-filtration mask with a valve allows you to breathe out and to wear the mask for longer and be more comfortable but removes any protection for others.

If wearing a mask make sure not to touch the outer surface, contaminate your hands and then transfer the contamination back to yourself. In a contaminated environment like a hospital, put on and remove your mask only and exclusively by the straps and wash your hands every time you touch it. Most people don’t do this, making the use of a mask pointless.

Ordinary glasses or sunglasses provide a degree of  protection from a cough or sneeze, making goggles unnecessary, except for those in a high-risk environment.

Contrary to common belief, the majority of modern, large airplanes are actually remarkably clean because of HEPA filtration and air conditioning systems which destroy viruses, even down to the size of coronaviruses. It is advisable to turn on the air vent above your head so the air can push any suspended particle to the ground faster.

Self-isolation

Self-isolation is different from quarantine. Anyone who tests positive for Covid-19 or has been in close contact with someone known to be infected by the virus will be kept isolated in quarantine.

Self isolation is a discretionary preventative measure that applies to people who have a higher chance of having been exposed to the virus. Individual government recommendations vary by country and are being regularly updated. Staff returning from assignments – or holidays – in countries where the coronavirus is more widespread and serious such as China, Italy or Iran are strongly recommended to self-isolate.

That means staying at home for 14 days, not using public transport and not doing anything that might expose others to the risk of infection. As much as possible, people in self isolation should keep to a separate room in the house, or at least  stay two metres away from family members. They should also avoid sharing food or toilet facilities or be the last one to use them before disinfecting.

Viruses are destroyed by detergents, alcohol, extreme drying and heat, so these are all good ways to de-contaminate, especially clothing.

Newsroom safety/working from home

News managers at organisations with offices, staff and freelancers around the world are struggling with conflicting advice from health authorities in different locations, while at the same time covering a story for which there is a huge appetite.

Different governments have different recommendations or regulations about what to do in case a member of staff tests positive for Covid-19. At the time of writing, the UK and other countries’ regulations do not require, nor recommend, closing down an office or sending staff home. However, some members tell INSI they have taken, or plan to take, a much more conservative and cautious approach by asking staff to work from home if at all possible should an employee come down with Covid-19.

However, it is widely agreed that anyone who has any flu-like symptoms (coughs, cold, sneezes) should categorically stay at home. This might be a culture change in some organisations but no one should be going into their work place with germ-ridden hands or runny noses. Employers must keep people with cold or flu symptoms out of the workplace to avoid spreading the virus and the anxiety associated with possible contagion

Organisations should get prepared for large numbers of staff working from home, ensuring they have extra personal laptops and access to VPNs, for example.

For those in the newsroom, public areas, including hot desks, must be thoroughly cleaned with an anti-bacterial cloth or spray. That includes door handles, toilets, shared facilities like kitchens and computer keyboards and mice.

Employees should be vaccinated against flu. The vaccine does not protect against coronavirus but avoiding ordinary flu is a good way of reducing unnecessary anxiety, alarming co-workers or ending up isolated or quarantined for a preventable reason.

Many news organisations are reconsidering foreign deployments entirely and cancelling all non-essential travel. INSI members say this is made slightly easier by a lack of interest in stories other than the coronavirus which is dominating the news agenda.

Plans to manage staff safety at the Euro 2020 football championships, which are scheduled to take place all over Europe this summer, and the Olympics in Japan are still being developed, assuming these events go ahead.

Managing staff abroad

It is essential to get prepared. Make sure local staff know where to go for medical treatment should they get sick. In countries where medical facilities are poor decide whether a trip to the hospital for oxygen, for example, is the best approach, or whether evacuation would be preferable. Reach out to hospitals or public health authorities in advance rather than waiting for something to happen. Have a plan in place at an early stage so you are prepared if staff are infected. Take account of any staff members with a pre-existing condition that could put them at greater risk.

Interviewing recovered patients

People can continue producing the virus for at least 14-16 days after the onset of symptoms. Avoid interviewing or getting close to anybody within that period of time.

Sources: Dr Richard Dawood, the Fleet Street Clinic; UK government; INSI members

Image by AFP via INSI

Killing the Messenger | 2019

Killing the Messenger | 2019

Killing the Messenger | 2019

Sharp decline in 2019 media deaths as reporters retreat from deadly conflicts

A total of 48 journalists died in incidents, and accidents, directly related to their job in 2019. That was the lowest number of media workers killed in 16 years, according to the ‘Killing The Messenger’ report of journalism casualties from around the world, published annually by the International News Safety Institute (INSI).

It was also a year of apparent breakthroughs in investigations into the murder of high profile journalists, with significant legal developments in the killings of Ján Kuciak from Slovakia; Saudi Arabia’s Jamal Kashoggi; and Daphne Caruana Galizia in Malta.

There was a big reduction in casualties in war zones, where deaths more than halved in 2019 compared to the previous year and were a fraction of the average tally for the previous two decades.

INSI director Elena Cosentino said that explanations behind the drop in the number of media casualties are multiple but a reduction of hostility towards the media is not one of them.

“Our industry was spared the mass killings that blighted previous years when dozens of media workers lost their lives in targeted attacks,” said Cosentino.

“There was also a big reduction in casualties in war zones. That’s not because war reporting got any safer. The decline in casualties was simply because fewer journalists reported from conflict zones in the first place. Syria, Yemen and Afghanistan were deemed simply too dangerous for either local or international media to cover and were dropped from many outlets’ news agenda.”

Mexico, where 12 journalists died, was the deadliest country for media workers in 2019, according to ‘Killing The Messenger’, which is compiled for INSI by the Cardiff School of Journalism. Tanzania was the second deadliest country on the INSI list, simply because a car accident claimed the lives of five media workers going about their jobs. Four journalists died in Afghanistan and also in Syria and three in Honduras and in Somalia.

Last year also marked the first time in 21 years that no journalist was killed on foreign soil. As international correspondents withdrew from the world’s most dangerous places, all 48 casualties that INSI recorded last year were local journalists reporting from their home countries. The majority died in places supposedly at peace, killed by unknown assailants while reporting on crime, politics and corruption.

Though in 80 percent of the cases impunity prevailed, legal developments on previous killings, particularly in Daphne Caruana Galizia’s case, provided some hope. However, progress only came after a relentless campaign waged by Daphne’s family, huge international pressure and intense media scrutiny from all over the world. Most murdered journalists don’t generate headlines when they are killed and the institutions that should protect them are often the biggest threats.

“Daphne’s case proves that with enough time and pressure even the most powerful could one day be held to account. As happened in Malta, raising the cost of killing a journalist is the ultimate aim for everyone in the news industry. Despite the progress made in 2019, that still feels like a long way off,” said Cosentino.

Read the full Killing the Messenger report.

 

Main image: AFP via INSI

INSI’s Killing the Messenger end-of-year report

INSI’s Killing the Messenger end-of-year report

2017 saw an unusually high number of women among the 68 journalists killed doing their jobs this year, according to Killing the Messenger, a biannual analysis of journalist casualties by the International News Safety Institute (INSI).

Out of the 68 journalists and media workers killed in connection with their work this year, nine were women. That is 13 percent of the total. Last year, the figures were three women out of 112 killed, or nearly three percent. In 2015 there were 10 women out of 101 casualties, or 10 percent.

This disproportionately high number of female casualties comes after a year when women across the industry spoke out en masse against the abuse and harassment they have experienced at the hands of sexual predators.

“This is the highest proportion of women killed in comparison with their male colleagues in the eight years since I joined INSI, and it is a particularly egregious finding in the current climate,” said INSI director Hannah Storm.

High profile female deaths in 2017 included Kim Wall whose headless torso was discovered in the sea near Copenhagen; Shifa Gardi, a pioneering Kurdish journalist; Gauri Lankesh who became the most high-profile journalist killed in India in recent years; and Miroslava Breach who spent the days before her murder in March documenting the murders of others in Mexico’s drug war.

Afghanistan, Mexico, Iraq, Syria and the Philippines were the five most dangerous countries for journalists in 2017, according to Killing the Messenger which is compiled for INSI by Cardiff School of Journalism.

Statistically speaking, the overall number of journalists killed is lower than in recent years, and insecurity does not discriminate on the basis of gender.

Out of the 68 media casualties, 32 men and women died in countries supposedly at peace such as Mexico, India and Malta.

The vast majority of casualties were local journalists, living and working where they died.

Four citizen journalists lost their lives this year, all but one of them in Syria where access for professional media workers continues to be difficult and dangerous.

INSI identified nine cases where suspects were identified, arrests made and legal proceedings initiated. These include Peter Madsen who has been charged with the murder of Wall and three men charged in connection with the killing of Malta’s Daphne Caruana Galizia, an investigative journalist blown up by a car bomb in October.

“At INSI we pay tribute to every journalist killed doing their work, whatever their gender, ethnicity or religion. The 68 men and women killed this year have paid the ultimate price and every single one leaves a legacy of loss,” said Storm.

(Source: INSI press release)

Journalists reporting on refugee crisis suffering from moral injury, says INSI

Journalists reporting on refugee crisis suffering from moral injury, says INSI

Journalists covering the refugee crisis have been affected by moral injury, according to a report published by the International News Safety Institute (INSI), which warns that this issue has the potential to have a significant impact on their mental health if nothing is done to prevent or treat it.

The Emotional Toll on Journalists Covering the Refugee Crisis” is the first study of its kind into the response of news media professionals covering a humanitarian crisis and was prompted by the arrival in Europe by sea of more than one million migrants in 2015.

Published by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, it shows how moral injury – a condition linked to experiencing events and behaviour that violate one’s moral compass – emerged as the biggest psychological challenging faced by those covering the refugee crisis.

“We recognise that the trauma experienced by journalists as witnesses could never be equated with the suffering endured by the migrants, but we wanted to try to better understand what some journalists were experiencing so we could ensure those covering the refugee crisis could continue their important work of recording history,” said Hannah Storm, INSI director, and co-author of the report with neuropsychiatrist Professor Anthony Feinstein.

Nine major European and North American news organisations took part in the survey, which included 114 journalists. In addition to the quantitative survey, various industry-wide interviews and meetings were carried out which corroborated the survey findings.

Yannis Behrakis (pictured left) turned his camera on his home country of Greece where he began covering the story in April 2015.

“A lot of times you are not sure what to do: leave the camera and actively help people come out of the sea or do practical things for them, drive them up the road, or give them clothes, or take their pictures,” said Behrakis, who works for Reuters, in an interview for the report.

“Of course, I always think this is the way I help and this is my job to make sure that everybody around the world knows what is happening and that is my mission.”

Key findings from the survey included:

  • Local journalists, parents and those working alone with no previous experience covering war are more likely to experience moral injury.
  • Moral injury is linked to an increased workload and a perceived lack of support from employers.
  • Neither post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) nor depression posed a significant risk for journalists covering the refugees.

“Moral injury is not a mental illness, which can be reassuring, but it should not be taken lightly for it comes with its own set of challenges,” said Feinstein. “It is to be hoped that the results of our study act as the impetus for an industry-wide discussion on how moral injury can be addressed and what changes need to take place,” Feinstein added.

The report concludes with a set of considerations for the news industry on how to support and educate those at risk of developing moral injury, and shows how its findings could have relevance to those working in other stories in non-conflict areas that have a traumatic content, such as domestic terror threats.

Killing the Messenger 2016

Afghanistan was the most dangerous country for media workers during the first six months of 2016, according to the International News Safety Institute’s (INSI) biannual report of media casualties, Killing the Messenger.

Two separate attacks by the Taliban in Afghanistan claimed the lives of 10 media workers between January and June 2016, including eight from Tolo TV, one of Afghanistan’s largest entertainment channels, in a direct attack on press freedom. Veteran US journalist David Gilkey and Afghan journalist Zabihullah Tamanna were also killed by Taliban militants in June when the armoured vehicle they were travelling in was struck by a rocket-propelled grenade.

A total of 49 media workers died in the first six months of the year, according to Killing The Messenger which is compiled for INSI by the Cardiff School of Journalism. This represents a slight decline compared with this time last year when the number of news media casualties stood at 60. However, that doesn’t mean the situation is improving.

“One reason for this slight decline is likely to be a decrease in the number of journalists reporting from bloody conflicts like Syria where in the past dozens have died – 28 were lost in 2012 for example,” said INSI director Hannah Storm.

“The growing prevalence of censorship is another possible factor in the decrease. In countries like Mexico, Guatemala and the Philippines, where powerful political and business interests often combine to violently silence the news media, the stakes are simply too high for some to continue reporting.”

Out of the 49 media workers killed so far this year, 26 died in countries supposedly at peace, such as Mexico and Guatemala.

Crime reporter Anabel Flores Salazar was one of eight journalists who died in Mexico, the second most dangerous country to report from, according to Killing The Messenger. The mother of two was murdered after being snatched from her home in Veracruz, a state that has become synonymous with journalist deaths.

Five journalists lost their lives in neighbouring Guatemala – the same number as in Yemen, a nation wracked by armed conflict.

INSI identified only two cases where suspects were identified or arrests made.

“At every international conference I attend, I hear the word impunity, but little has changed. The murderers of journalists are almost never punished,” said Storm.

“Impunity will remain and journalists will continue to die while ineffective authorities allow their killers to get away with murder.”

(Source: INSI press release)